| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 07/16] xfs: add CRC checks for quota blocks |
| From: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:36:15 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1361755901-12453-8-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1361755901-12453-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1361755901-12453-8-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hi Dave, On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:31:32PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Use the reserved space in struct xfs_dqblk to store a UUID and a crc > for the quota blocks. > > [dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx] Add a LSN field and update for current verifier > infrastructure. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> Been over this and it looks fine. > @@ -897,6 +910,10 @@ xfs_qm_dqiter_bufs( > if (error) > break; > > + /* > + * XXX(hch): need to figure out if it makes sense to validate > + * the CRC here. > + */ What's you're opinion on this? -Ben |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: strange behavior of a larger xfs directory, Hans-Peter Jansen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: request for stable inclusion, Ben Myers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: handle new mkfs.btrfs -f option cleanly, Rich Johnston |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 07/16] xfs: add CRC checks for quota blocks, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |