| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 00/10] xfstests: Stress tests improments v5 |
| From: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:00:07 -0600 |
| Cc: | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>, dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20130225220941.GH5551@dastard> |
| References: | <1361356935-29153-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130225154512.GA32171@xxxxxxxxx> <20130225212811.GY22182@xxxxxxx> <20130225220941.GH5551@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hi, On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 09:09:41AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 03:28:11PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:45:12AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > Hi, what's the status of this patch series? It looks like Dmitry has > > > responded to all of Dave's concerns --- is that correct? > > > > > > Is there anything else we need to do before these patches get merged > > > into the xfstests git tree? > > > > I think we just need a review to see if Dave's concerns have been addressed > > and > > then we're ready to go. > > That doesn't stop anyone else from reviewing it. Yes. Anyone is welcome to extend a Reviewed-by. ;) -Ben |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] xfs: add quota-driven speculative preallocation throttling, Mark Tinguely |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Consistent throughput challenge -- fragmentation?, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 00/10] xfstests: Stress tests improments v5, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [no subject], NOTIFICATION ALERT |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |