| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/2 V3] xfstests: test EROFS vs. EEXIST when creating on an RO filesystem |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:50:26 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <50ED9837.8040301@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <50B52DB7.3030506@xxxxxxxxxx> <50ED9726.4030008@xxxxxxxxxxx> <50ED9837.8040301@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 10:17:59AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > TBH, I don't know if this is posix-specified, but I found out the > hard way that when trying to re-create existing files on a readonly > filesystem, some apps expect/handle EEXIST, but fail on EROFS. > > This will test mkdir, mknod, and symlinks for that behavior. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- Looks fine. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: move _filter_ln to common.filter, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Upgrade, Account |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 2/2 V3] xfstests: test EROFS vs. EEXIST when creating on an RO filesystem, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2 V3] xfstests: test EROFS vs. EEXIST when creating on an RO filesystem, Ben Myers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |