| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: simplify the fallocate path |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:56:38 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20121210105211.GA2794@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20121208120812.755863148@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20121208121006.286014845@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20121210020956.GN15784@dastard> <20121210105211.GA2794@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:52:12AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:09:56PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > You don't use this flag anywhere ;) > > Fixed. > > > While I like most of this series, I don't really like the > > duplication of this piece of code. It seems to me that a simple > > helper like: > > I had that in a previous version, but it seemed uglier than just > opencoding it. I'll give it another try, maybe I can come up > with something nicer now. I've looked at this and it does not seem to improve the code at all, unless you have a strong objection I'm going to repost the series just with the above unused variable removed. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Is xfs_fsr broken for Linux 3.8-rc?, Michael L. Semon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfsdump INTERRUPT issue, Jeffrey |
| Previous by Thread: | Is xfs_fsr broken for Linux 3.8-rc?, Michael L. Semon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: simplify the fallocate path, Mark Tinguely |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |