| To: | Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:35:17 +1100 |
| Cc: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20121211182000.GB29421@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20121203144208.143464631@xxxxxxx> <20121211182000.GB29421@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:20:00AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:42:08PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > Here a collection of bug fixes for 3.0-stable. Many of these patches > > were also selected by Dave Chinner as possible 3.0-stable patches: > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-08/msg00255.html > > > > I chose only bug fixes and kept the changes to a minimum. > > > > Patch 21/22 are required for the bug fix in patch 23 but they are > > important changes in their own right. > > So, XFS maintainers, should I queue these up for the next 3.0-stable > release or not? Hi Greg, it needs review first. Previously backports like this haven't been sent to -stable until reviews have already been done.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Warning your mailbox is over its size limit, System Administrator |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches, Greg KH |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches, Greg KH |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches, Greg KH |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |