| To: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Dec 2012 08:45:05 +1100 |
| Cc: | stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20121203144208.143464631@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20121203144208.143464631@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:42:08PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote: > Here a collection of bug fixes for 3.0-stable. Many of these patches > were also selected by Dave Chinner as possible 3.0-stable patches: > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-08/msg00255.html > > I chose only bug fixes and kept the changes to a minimum. > > Patch 21/22 are required for the bug fix in patch 23 but they are > important changes in their own right. So I'll ask the same question that Christoph asked me: If nobody is reporting problems on 3.0.x, why do this and risk regression and fallout that requires fixing? FWIW, what testing have you done? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 4/4] xfs: preallocation throttling tracepoints, Brian Foster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfsdump INTERRUPT issue, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches, Ben Myers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches, Mark Tinguely |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |