| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: test EROFS vs. EEXIST when creating on an RO filesystem |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:19:16 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <50B53AEA.3080102@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <50B52DB7.3030506@xxxxxxxxxx> <20121127221111.GA13753@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <50B53AEA.3080102@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:12:58PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > No single filesystem, really - > > I temporarily broke the VFS in a rhel backport. ;) But it seems like > the kind of thing that could be missed in the future, so figured it was > worth a quick test. That's what I wonder about, I was pretty sure we'd normmally do these checks in the VFS, and I haven't seen any reason changes from you in the area. I'm fine with adding this test, btw. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: test EROFS vs. EEXIST when creating on an RO filesystem, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: fix direct IO nested transaction deadlock., Mark Tinguely |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: test EROFS vs. EEXIST when creating on an RO filesystem, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH V2] xfstests: test EROFS vs. EEXIST when creating on an RO filesystem, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |