| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: test EROFS vs. EEXIST when creating on an RO filesystem |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:11:11 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <50B52DB7.3030506@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <50B52DB7.3030506@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 03:16:39PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > TBH, I don't know if this is posix-specified, but I found out the > hard way that when trying to re-create existing files on a readonly > filesystem, some apps expect/handle EEXIST, but fail on EROFS. > > This will test mkdir, mknod, and symlinks for that behavior. Just curious, which filesystem would fail this currently or did in the past? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: test EROFS vs. EEXIST when creating on an RO filesystem, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: test EROFS vs. EEXIST when creating on an RO filesystem, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: test EROFS vs. EEXIST when creating on an RO filesystem, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: test EROFS vs. EEXIST when creating on an RO filesystem, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |