| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: inode allocation should use unmapped buffers. |
| From: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:12:53 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1353641065-14983-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1353641065-14983-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1353641065-14983-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hi Dave,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 02:24:23PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Inode buffers do not need to be mapped as inodes are read or written
> directly from/to the pages underlying the buffer. This fixes a
> regression introduced by commit 611c994 ("xfs: make XBF_MAPPED the
> default behaviour").
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
committed to git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git, master and for-next.
What's with the multiple Signed-off-by? Is your cousin Dave getting involved
in XFS development too? Welcome! ;)
Thanks,
Ben
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: Remove the description about nodelaylog mount option from, the xfs document., Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: inode allocation should use unmapped buffers., Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: inode allocation should use unmapped buffers., Mark Tinguely |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: inode allocation should use unmapped buffers., Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |