| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: inode allocation should use unmapped buffers. |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:57:41 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1353410831-22653-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1353410831-22653-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1353410831-22653-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:27:10PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Inode buffers do not need to be mapped as inodes are read or written
> directly from/to the pages underlying the buffer. This fixes a
> regression introduced by commit 611c994 ("xfs: make XBF_MAPPED the
> default behaviour").
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 2/2 V3] xfstests: xfs_tosspages() test addition, Mark Tinguely |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: fix direct IO nested transaction deadlock., Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 1/2] xfs: inode allocation should use unmapped buffers., Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH V2] xfstest 287: userspace vs. fragmented multiblock dir2, Mark Tinguely |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |