| To: | Aaron Goulding <aarongldng@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS filesystem recovery from secondary superblocks |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Nov 2012 08:02:10 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <CABJyUz+r7yQSswqyBng_W=fAXxTz9heb88NeiKSeFU7j4ZD=Hw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CABJyUz+h=pZ6+2rro1PjoB1ggTAoRw+bTzc_bU7Eaec0_AUKLA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20121101225938.GS29378@dastard> <CABJyUz+VhUY=tVKpEeKXfQRoaL4s+gwNmRr4wNAnRX6zTt5xXg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CABJyUz+r7yQSswqyBng_W=fAXxTz9heb88NeiKSeFU7j4ZD=Hw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 07:16:06AM -0800, Aaron Goulding wrote: > Well I found an error in my bgrep. I was searching for XFSB but in the > wrong order. Once fixed, I get almost 19,000 results, but I note most of That seems like way too many to be filesystem metadata hits. I woul dhave expected the same number of hits as there are AGs in the filesytem. What you want is the XFSB string in the first 4 bytes of a sector, with the next sector having XAGF as the first four bytes.... > those results happen within one section on the drive. I've attached the > first 1MB from that point (4398047346688 bytes in) and I will grab the > other results as 1K blocks. I'm not going to look at 19000 potential hits. Narrow it down to likely candidates first whithe the sector location filter... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] fiemap: add freespace mapping to FS_IOC_FIEMAP, Mark Tinguely |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: add CRC infrastructure, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS filesystem recovery from secondary superblocks, Aaron Goulding |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS filesystem recovery from secondary superblocks, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |