| To: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch v4 06/13] [PATCH 06/13] xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant. |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:15:43 -0400 |
| Cc: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20121005180446.GN25175@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20121005171853.985930109@xxxxxxx> <20121005171946.330155632@xxxxxxx> <506F1F21.6000104@xxxxxxx> <20121005180446.GN25175@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 01:04:46PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > Christoph suggested that xfs_flush_inodes should take an xfs_mount instead of > an inode. It is operating on the super_block level to flush multiple inodes > rather than the single inode whose pointer was passed in, so I moved it from > xfs_inode.h to xfs_mount.h. It's more than a trivial wrapper now, so I'd suggest to move out of line to e.g. xfs_super.c |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch v4 06/13] [PATCH 06/13] xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant., Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch v4 06/13] [PATCH 06/13] xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant., Mark Tinguely |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch v4 06/13] [PATCH 06/13] xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant., Ben Myers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch v4 06/13] [PATCH 06/13] xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant., Mark Tinguely |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |