| To: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? |
| From: | "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:42:01 -0400 |
| Cc: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120918182841.GA3343@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <nsxa9wojdcd.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120918064039.GS11511@dastard> <50588898.6050802@xxxxxxx> <20120918181556.GC28689@xxxxxxxxx> <20120918182841.GA3343@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:28:41PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > Your impression is just a few days out of date. See: > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-09/msg00156.html On a unrelated note, has there been any thought about potentially setting up a separate mailing list dedicated for xfstests? I'm not subscribed to the xfs mailing list, mainly because I was trying to avoid adding yet another high volume mailing list to my inbox (although to be fair, I guess it's only 25 messages per day even on the busiest days), and so I've missed out on review of Dave's changes to break out the tests into hierarchies, etc. I wonder if there are other xfstests users that aren't yet subscribed to the xfs mailing list who would if there was a separate mailing list. Not a big deal; if people really don't want a separate mailing list, I guess I could subscribe to the xfs list as well... - Ted |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?, Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?, Ben Myers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?, Ben Myers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?, Ben Myers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |