| To: | Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH V3] Make inode64 a remountable option |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:24:37 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1345171178-10447-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1345171178-10447-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:39:38PM -0300, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > Actually, there is no reason about why a user must umount and mount a XFS > filesystem to enable 'inode64' option. So, this patch makes this a remountable > option. What does protect concurrent updates of m_flags? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: minor inode64 mount option cleanup, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfstests: loop devices vs umount stupidity, Rich Johnston |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH V3] Make inode64 a remountable option, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH V3] Make inode64 a remountable option, Carlos Maiolino |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |