Re: [PATCH] xfs: implement ->update

xfs

Re: [PATCH] xfs: implement ->update_time

To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] xfs: implement ->update_time
From:	Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 6 Jul 2012 10:55:27 +1000
Cc:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20120606210128.GA12819@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20120606210128.GA12819@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 05:01:28PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Use this new method to replace our hacky use of ->dirty_inode.  An additional
> benefit is that we can now propagate errors up the stack.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Looks good, all my local qa passes.

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [PATCH] xfs: implement ->update_time, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH] xfs: implement ->update_time, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH] xfs: implement ->update_time, Dave Chinner <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH 0/5] do not take the iolock in inode reclaim context, Sage Weil
Next by Date:	Re: 3.5.0-rc5: inconsistent lock state, Dave Chinner
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] xfs: implement ->update_time, Dave Chinner
Next by Thread:	[PATCH 0/7] inode allocator refactoring V2, Christoph Hellwig
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]