| To: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Storage server, hung tasks and tracebacks |
| From: | Brian Candler <B.Candler@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 May 2012 14:14:27 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=sasl; bh=cgT5fePqzNbHdBJguLSFt9jBuMs=; b=C5j3zHz eGW0RH/b8ghTF+wcRzO4LNtv/r1TGg9ddrPRmP74wUv/5d7QKYGlV24dxTUL5f0G vg/IrvPY8KYg/QbtuL72BQONXldLHudbCkc3qeSyKqIA5oSZyw2U9Eq0YEskBYvc igXItjU+EymD6tYzzHeqJojJNSjL+L6fq/1s= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; q=dns; s=sasl; b=b8XU823i48WWJIWa/deauGAWOAw2kVVXV UlszsNzTWA9e52yo0QIYMxie7dsSqc61fKu7dBzFPrb18B70dTbKTxGa0sSQlLJ/ pCV1AIpoFo+kxM+N2WlCMf60RajAEEI2tlg2s772bQgpsVS3Cy8Ew67659UYMI7Y Y1Q2nIb5Bo= |
| In-reply-to: | <20120520163506.GA7473@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20120502184450.GA2557@xxxxxxxx> <4FA27EF8.6040002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120503204157.GC4387@xxxxxxxx> <4FA3047D.8060908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120504163237.GA6128@xxxxxxxx> <4FA4C321.2070105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120515140237.GA3630@xxxxxxxx> <20120520163506.GA7473@xxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 05:35:06PM +0100, Brian Candler wrote: > The main discovery: using ext4 instead of xfs, I cannot get the server to > lock up - after 36 hours of continuous testing anyway. With xfs and > everything else identical, it typically locks up within 10 minutes. I re-ran the test using btrfs (not that I would use it in production, but just as another comparison). No lockup after over 24 hours either. So for now I am converting these boxes to ext4. I should soon have another test box with 24 disks that I can reformat as XFS, if something changes and you'd like me to retest it. I'd still like to use XFS at some point in the future because this is running gluster on top, and the gluster people recommend XFS and do most of their testing with it. Regards, Brian. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] xfs: fix xfsaild hang due to premature idle, Mark Tinguely |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 2/3 RESEND] xfs_repair fixes for fragmented multiblock v2 dirs, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Storage server, hung tasks and tracebacks, Brian Candler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Storage server, hung tasks and tracebacks, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |