| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfs: More xfs_buf cleanups |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:02:42 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120411200821.GK28816@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1334052213-26870-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120411200821.GK28816@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 04:08:22PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:03:30PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > These 3 patches sit on top of my recent series titled: > > > > [PATCH 0/8] xfs: clean up unit usage in xfs_buf V2 > > > > These patches remove bits of the API that are effectively the > > default behaviour used by everything or are redundant. This just > > makes API usage simpler and gives it a smaller footprint to modify > > in future. > > If you touch these interfaces any chance you could kill the impliciy > XBF_MAPPED thing we do in various places? Probably best by reversing > it and only pass in an XBF_UNMAPPED for the inode buffers as that's > the only place where we want them. Sounds like a good idea. I'll write a patch to do this.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfstests: sync before umount to avoid device busy problems, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 01/18] xfs: Ensure inode reclaim can run during quotacheck, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfs: More xfs_buf cleanups, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, master, updated. v3.2-rc1-23753-g0034102, xfs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |