| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: remove the per-filesystem list of dquots |
| From: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:58:45 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120313215409.GI5091@dastard> |
| References: | <20120313085232.134690907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120313085308.997632929@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120313200354.GI7762@xxxxxxx> <20120313215409.GI5091@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 08:54:09AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:03:54PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 04:52:36AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > + struct xfs_dquot *batch[XFS_DQ_LOOKUP_BATCH]; > > > > Eesh.. that probably doesn't need to go onto the stack. I know we are > > doing it elsewhere too, and that we also sometimes complain about other > > peoples' stack usage. Don't necessarily have to clean it up now, > > though. ;) > > Actually, if we do the walk from the shrinker we can't reliably > allocate it, so it has to go on the stack. D'oh, I missed that idea completely in my review. :/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs log error: head behind tail, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | How to deal with XFS stripe geometry mismatch with hardware RAID5, troby |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: remove the per-filesystem list of dquots, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: remove the per-filesystem list of dquots, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |