Re: Safe to use XFS in production in Linux 3.2.9?

[Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>]

Sean,

On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 11:08:38AM -0500, Sean Thomas Caron wrote:
> OK, Linux 3.2.9 doesn't sound very safe to use in production. So, fine, 
> we can try 3.0.23; it appears that a fix for CVE-2012-0056 was applied 
> around 3.0.19 so it should be all set in that regard.
>
> I'm comparing the contents of the xfs-bulletproof-sync patch with the  
> 3.0.23 XFS sources and it's not entirely clear to me if 3.0.23 fully  
> implements the fixes in the patch. Please forgive me because it's a  
> little long, but here's the contents of the patch:

Looks like this fix made 3.0.16:

# git describe 6826d3e80d143ca7411fd2dca05bc57c7ed3e620
v3.0.15-68-g6826d3e

-Ben