| To: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS filesystem setfacl has limitation? |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:40:53 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120307221613.1014ea82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4F56C4D5.1070206@xxxxxxxxx> <20120307044242.GJ3592@dastard> <20120307221613.1014ea82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:16:13PM +0100, Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Wed, 7 Mar 2012 15:42:42 +1100 vous écriviez: > > > It's basically a limitation of the on-disk format definition that > > has been carried over from Irix. It is an arbitrary limit - the real > > limit is the maximum size of an attribute (64KB) and we plan to > > raise it to that limit as part of the upcoming on-disk format > > changes for metadata checksums... > > > > What's the proposed time frame or kernel version for this change? When it is ready. Think months, not years ;) Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: df bigger than ls?, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: df bigger than ls?, Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS filesystem setfacl has limitation?, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 0/10] xfs: various fixes v2, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |