| To: | stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: creating a new 80 TB XFS |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:08:20 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4F499F81.7080305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <4F478818.4050803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120224150805.243e4906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F47B020.4000202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20297.22833.759182.360340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F499F81.7080305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Le Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:57:05 -0600 vous écriviez:
> As others mentioned, an xfs_[check|repair] can take many hours or even
> days on a multi-terabyte huge metadata filesystem.
Just nitpicking, but I never had such a problem. I've run quite a lot
of xfs_repair on 40TB+ filesystems, and it rarely was longer than 10 to
20 minutes. The important part is having enough RAM if the system hits
swap it makes the check much slower).
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: mount: Structure needs cleaning, MikeJeezy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: creating a new 80 TB XFS, Joe Landman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: creating a new 80 TB XFS, Stan Hoeppner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: creating a new 80 TB XFS, Joe Landman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |