| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/9] xfs: use per-CPU data for the quota statistics |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:48:14 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120215235929.GP14132@dastard> |
| References: | <20120215022926.577682146@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120215023147.414783335@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120215235929.GP14132@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:59:29AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Why not just make val a 64bit value so overflow is simply not an > issue? It's a 1:1 copy an paste from the normal XFS stats. But thinking about this copy and paste is bad - I'll rework this to add the quota stats that we keep into the normal XFS stats, and just provide the two old quota stats files as legacy views into them. That way we'll have only a single copy of that code. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/9] xfs: remove the per-filesystem list of dquots, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: user per-cpu stats for the total dquot numbers, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/9] xfs: use per-CPU data for the quota statistics, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 3/9] xfs: remove the per-filesystem list of dquots, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |