| To: | Tom Crane <T.Crane@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_fsr (defragmenting) 'XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=xxxxxx: Invalid argument' error |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:32:17 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120215002811.GM7479@dastard> |
| References: | <4F3AAC04.5090400@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120215002811.GM7479@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:28:11AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/xfs/msg09736.html Well, that shows how slow the XFS mailing list can be at times. I found Eric's reply in this thread in an internet archive via google before it arrived in my inbox. IOWs, the the mail archive site received it, published it and google crawled it before the XFS list finished distributing the mail to all recipiants.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS unlink still slow on 3.1.9 kernel ?, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 1/9] xfs: use per-filesystem dquot LRU lists, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr (defragmenting) 'XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=xxxxxx: Invalid argument' error, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr (defragmenting) 'XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=xxxxxx: Invalid argument' error, Michael Monnerie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |