xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH v2] xfsdump: use the full 32-bit generation number

from [Christoph Hellwig] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Bill Kendall <wkendall@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfsdump: use the full 32-bit generation number
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:47:20 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1328813180-29095-1-git-send-email-wkendall@xxxxxxx>
References: <1328813180-29095-1-git-send-email-wkendall@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) 
Looks generally good to me, but is there any good reason to not make
the -K argument extensible by requiring a version argument, even if
that one currently only supports 2 and 3 as valid values?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: quotacheck speed, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix msync() call in fsx.c:domapwrite(), Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:  [PATCH v2] xfsdump: use the full 32-bit generation number, Bill Kendall
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH v2] xfsdump: use the full 32-bit generation number, Bill Kendall
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]