| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Optimal XFS formatting options? |
| From: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:55:13 +0100 |
| Cc: | Peter Grandi <pg_xf2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20249.22727.359884.733592@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | it-management http://it-management.at |
| References: | <33140169.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F192DEC.4030400@xxxxxxxxx> <20249.22727.359884.733592@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.1.5-zmi; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) |
On Freitag, 20. Januar 2012 Peter Grandi wrote: > * There be 32b inode numbers, which limit inodes to the first > 1TB of a filetree if sector size is 512B. > > * The 32b block IO subsystems limits partition sizes to 16TiB. I thought those two have been removed by some updates? I think I remember to have read that. Not that it's too interesting, I've been running on 64b Linux everywhere since AMD has put it in their processors. Should be 10+ years or so. -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services: Protéger http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Optimal XFS formatting options?, Michael Monnerie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 3/8] ext4: Protect ext4_page_mkwrite & ext4_setattr with sb_start_write - sb_end_write, Jan Kara |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Optimal XFS formatting options?, Peter Grandi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Optimal XFS formatting options?, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |