Re: xfs-trace-ilock-more

xfs

Re: xfs-trace-ilock-more

To:	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: xfs-trace-ilock-more
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 18 Dec 2011 15:27:34 -0500
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20111214182750.GH11114@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20111214024040.GA17780@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111214182750.GH11114@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:27:50AM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> Hey Christoph,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:40:40PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Can you explain the story behid this patch in SLES11SP1?
> 
> We were looking at some performance issues and needed a bit more information
> on the amount of time spent in ilock. I can give you more specifics if you
> want, I just have to dig up the e-mails (it's been a while).

Given that the patch is fairly clean can you send it to us for
inclusion?

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
xfs-trace-ilock-more, Christoph Hellwig Re: xfs-trace-ilock-more, Mark Fasheh Re: xfs-trace-ilock-more, Jeff Mahoney Re: xfs-trace-ilock-more, Dave Chinner Re: xfs-trace-ilock-more, Jeff Mahoney Re: xfs-trace-ilock-more, Christoph Hellwig Re: xfs-trace-ilock-more, Christoph Hellwig <=

Previous by Date:	Re: xfs-trace-ilock-more, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 09/11] xfs: remove the i_new_size field in struct xfs_inode, Dave Chinner
Previous by Thread:	Re: xfs-trace-ilock-more, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] xfstests: open btrfsck to check the btrfs filesystem, Miao Xie
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]