| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/12] xfs: compound buffers for directory blocks |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Dec 2011 01:35:08 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1323238703-13198-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1323238703-13198-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 05:18:11PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > The series passes xfstests on 4k/4k, 4k/512b, 64k/4k and 64k/512b > (dirblksz/fsblksz) configurations without any new regressions, and > survives 100 million inode fs_mark benchmarks on a 17TB filesystem > using 4k/4k, 64k/512b and 64k/512b configurations. Do you have any benchmark numbers showing performance improvements for the large directory block case? |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 11/12] xfs: remove struct xfs_dabuf and infrastructure, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests/071 FAIL with pwrite64: Invalid argument, Peng Haitao |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 11/12] xfs: remove struct xfs_dabuf and infrastructure, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/12] xfs: compound buffers for directory blocks, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |