xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: xfs: validate inode numbers in file handles correctly

from [Christoph Hellwig] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: hank peng <pengxihan@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs: validate inode numbers in file handles correctly
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:17:38 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Guoquan Yang <ygq51@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAJNJY8RSOX2XsbM+0riNNPGxaLGm+OWkHexTVM4v5+rhkchuAw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1276846374-23916-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20111123T134243-580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111123143045.GA20892@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111128111947.GA26454@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAJNJY8RSOX2XsbM+0riNNPGxaLGm+OWkHexTVM4v5+rhkchuAw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) 
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 04:27:39PM +0800, hank peng wrote:
> I haven't tested this patch, but I have a question now: although I use
> inode64 option when mounting, my filesystem did not exceed 2T limit,
> so, 32-bit inode would be no problem, right?

In the normal configuration > 32bit inode numbers kick in at 1TB
filesystem sizes.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] xfstests: check if qa user can execute commands, Jan Schmidt
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] xfstests: check if qa user can execute commands, Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:  Re: xfs: validate inode numbers in file handles correctly, hank peng
Next by Thread:  RE: xfs: validate inode numbers in file handles correctly, yangguoquan
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]