| To: | Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfstests/071 FAIL with XFS Assertion |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:46:25 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4EC05F9C.7030106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4EBCC112.3020108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111113115223.GA19435@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4EC05F9C.7030106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 08:23:56AM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote: > On 11/13/2011 07:52 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:30:42PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote: > >> v3.1.0-10325-g3155521 > > > > Hmm, this a is a test not run in the auto group. Do you have tested > > it on older kernels where it works, aka do you know if this is a > > regresion? > > > > No, have not. I'll do it later. I can't reproduce it on any of my test setups. It actually fails on the 32-bit setups because the large offset writes succeed but the testcase doesn't expect it, but it doesn't crash the system. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] 254: disable space cache, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 2/8] xfstests: rename USE_BIG_LOOPFS to be more generic, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfstests/071 FAIL with XFS Assertion, Wanlong Gao |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Define a new function xfs_this_quota_on(), Alex Elder |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |