| To: | Alan Cook <acook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS realtime O_DIRECT failures |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 9 Nov 2011 03:01:33 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <loom.20111108T180925-222@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <loom.20111108T180925-222@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 05:37:55PM +0000, Alan Cook wrote: > Have I uncovered a legitimate or known bug or is there something wrong with my > XFS setup? It might sounda a bit harsh, but the problem is that use the realtime subvolume. It hasn't really been maintained or been part of the tested setup, and most distros in the know ship with it disabled. I went through and fixed it when we got bug reports once in a while, and I'm happy to look into your issues once I get a bit spare time, but in general use is highly discouraged. Is there any specific reason why you want to use the RT subvolume? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: use per-filesystem I/O completion workqueues, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH repair: do not walk the unlinked inode list, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS realtime O_DIRECT failures, Alan Cook |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS realtime O_DIRECT failures, Alan Cook |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |