Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC

To:	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions
From:	David Sterba <dave@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:01:48 +0100
Cc:	dave@xxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, aelder@xxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<87sjm0kqjk.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to:	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>, dave@xxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, aelder@xxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References:	<1320342953-7973-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> <1320342953-7973-6-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> <20111107132533.GP12759@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87sjm0kqjk.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to:	dave@xxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.4.2.2i

On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 05:31:11PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> > 269      [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see 269.out.bad)
> > --- 269.out     2011-11-07 13:26:23.000000000 +0100
> > +++ 269.out.bad 2011-11-07 14:07:44.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
> >  Run fsstress
> > 
> >  Run dd writers in parallel
> > +./269: line 60: kill: (9754) - No such process
> > 
> > > + wait $pid
> > > +}
> > 
> > and the test is reported to fail. Seems that the dd commands finish in less 
> > 2
> > seconds.
> Have you recompile fsstress via make?

That was it, thanks.

david

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH 1/9] xfstests: fsstress add command line style output for show_opts, Dmitry Monakhov [PATCH 2/9] xfstests: freeze fsstress options for 117'th, Dmitry Monakhov [PATCH 3/9] xfstests: add fallocate support to fsstress, Dmitry Monakhov [PATCH 4/9] xfstests: fsstress add FS_IOC_{SET,GET}FLAGS operations v2, Dmitry Monakhov [PATCH 5/9] xfstests: add fiemap operation to fsstress, Dmitry Monakhov [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, Dmitry Monakhov Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, David Sterba Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, Dmitry Monakhov Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, David Sterba <= Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, Christoph Hellwig [PATCH 7/9] xfstests: add a new quota test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, Dmitry Monakhov Re: [PATCH 7/9] xfstests: add a new quota test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH 7/9] xfstests: add a new quota test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, Dmitry Monakhov [PATCH 8/9] xfstress: add regression testcase for d583fb87a3ff0, Dmitry Monakhov [PATCH 9/9] xfstress: Test data journaling flag switch for a single file, Dmitry Monakhov Re: [PATCH 1/9] xfstests: fsstress add command line style output for show_opts, Dave Chinner

Previous by Date:	[BUG] assert in xfs_imap_to_bp, line 185, Ben Myers
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, Dmitry Monakhov
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions, Christoph Hellwig
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]