Re: [PATCH 7/8] xfstests: add new stress test

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:29:48PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> During stress testing we want to cover as much code paths as possible
> fsstress is very good for this purpose. But it has expandable nature
> (disk usage almost continually grow). So once it goes in no ENOSPC
> condition it will be where till the end. But by running 'dd' writers
> in parallel we can regularly trigger ENOSPC but only for a limited
> periods of time because each time it opens file with O_TRUNC.

Looks good, but please use a more useful subject line, e.g.

xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions.