| To: | Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Check the return value of xfs_trans_get_buf() |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:09:50 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS Mailing List <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1316541954.9298.65.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1316527015.9298.60.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110920150029.GA5239@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1316541954.9298.65.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:05:54PM -0500, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > > I do not understand. Can you elaborate on what needs to be done. All callers that do the xfs_trans_binval only really care about buffers that already exist. So we don't even have to allocate a new buffer if it isn't in memory yet - note that it generally will be given that the buffer is attached to the transaction. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Check the return value of xfs_trans_get_buf(), Chandra Seetharaman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfsdump: enable dump header checksums, Bill Kendall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Check the return value of xfs_trans_get_buf(), Chandra Seetharaman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Check the return value of xfs_trans_get_buf(), Alex Elder |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |