| To: | Bernard Chan <bernard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ENOSPC and filesystem shutdowns |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Sep 2011 04:00:51 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <CAKxAxjFUMrQpb5kQUdpRdt2wx83oKxaLZPTVTR_j43dkhcOyyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CAKxAxjFgBd0Vt02m7FJKq_ZWNBBJ5B=N4u7kS69FKtOKT4UowA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110905074734.GA18504@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAKxAxjFUMrQpb5kQUdpRdt2wx83oKxaLZPTVTR_j43dkhcOyyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 07:09:55PM +0800, Bernard Chan wrote: > So should we bother with inode64 and 64-bit servers with NFS4, and should we > anticipate any other issues running on this setup with a 4TB volume without > enabling inode64? I would absolutely recommend using inode64 if your are running a pure 64-bit environment. Even if you are not running out of inodes it will give you a much better allocation pattern. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ENOSPC and filesystem shutdowns, Michael Monnerie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xfs_repair segfaut in stage 6, Bartosz Cisek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ENOSPC and filesystem shutdowns, Michael Monnerie |
| Next by Thread: | Ihre Won 915.810, 00, Locteria Nacional |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |