| To: | "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfstests #62 broken on ext4 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:09:25 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110814004417.GA3524@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <E1QsFMR-0001iq-Vt@tytso-glaptop> <20110813201419.GA6442@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110814004417.GA3524@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 08:44:17PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote: > I see there's an sort command at the very end of _extend_test_bed(), I > presume we should also add a similar "LC_COLLATE=POSIX sort" to the > other "find" command pipelines, and it's easy enough to filter out the > lost+found directory by adding a "! -name lost+found". A patch from you or Stefan would be very welcome. Note that at least for btrfs I see problems with the user.name2 attribute in that test too, so it might be a bit of effort to sort out what actually is going on. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfstests #62 broken on ext4, Ted Ts'o |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: mkfs.xfs blank sw value mapped to (unsigned long)(-1), expensive when using swalloc, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfstests #62 broken on ext4, Ted Ts'o |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfstests #62 broken on ext4, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |