| To: | Bill Kendall <wkendall@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfsdump: convert to the POSIX signal API |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Aug 2011 06:56:13 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110803104813.GA3575@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1311972011-1446-1-git-send-email-wkendall@xxxxxxx> <1311972011-1446-5-git-send-email-wkendall@xxxxxxx> <20110803104813.GA3575@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 06:48:13AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Why yare all these sigaction calls needed? As far as I can see > there is no way we'll ever use a different signal handler than > "sigaction" for any signal, so simply modifying the signal mask > should be enough. Sorry, the on eand only signal handler is called "sighandler" of course. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfsdump: convert to the POSIX signal API, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/8] ext4: Warn if direct reclaim tries to writeback pages, Johannes Weiner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfsdump: convert to the POSIX signal API, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfsdump: convert to the POSIX signal API, Bill Kendall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |