| To: | Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfstests: Add support for btrfs in 015 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:47:56 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <bebfc5c98e0fb878f55c1312d8750ce7b7f82e07.1311776403.git.sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <cover.1311776403.git.sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <bebfc5c98e0fb878f55c1312d8750ce7b7f82e07.1311776403.git.sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:28:00AM +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote: > Added btrfs to the list of supported filesystems for test 015, and > increased free space reporting tolerance to 10% for btrfs. > Replaced the call to _scratch_mkfs_xfs with the XFS specific size > parameter by the generic one for sized filesystem creation which is > _scratch_mkfs_sized. ACK for the _scratch_mkfs_sized changed, but I'm really curious why we would allow so much more tolerance for btrfs. And again, why can't these be marked generic? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfstests: Add support for btrfs in 083, 117, 120 and 192, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfstests: Add support for btrfs in 079, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 3/4] xfstests: Add support for btrfs in 015, Stefan Behrens |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfstests: Add support for btrfs in 015, Stefan Behrens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |