| To: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs: encapsulate a block of debug code |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:30:28 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1311104952.1964.24.camel@doink> |
| References: | <201107181814.p6IIEAZm028909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110719171028.GA31088@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1311104952.1964.24.camel@doink> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 02:49:12PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > What about xfs_da_blkinfo_onlychild_validate()? Sounds a bit clumsy, but given that I can't suggest a better one I'm fine with it. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfstests: fix fsx build with the new xfs headers, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/8] xfs: Warn if direct reclaim tries to writeback pages, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs: encapsulate a block of debug code, Alex Elder |
| Next by Thread: | xfsprogs: fix some printf() warnings that show up for ia64 builds., Alex Elder |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |