| To: | "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: failure mapping nfs fh to inode should return ESTALE |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:31:26 -0400 |
| Cc: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110714205036.GA19457@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20110714205036.GA19457@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 04:50:36PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> > > On xfs exports, nfsd is incorrectly returning ENOENT instead of ESTALE > on attempts to use a filehandle of a deleted file (spotted with pynfs > test PUTFH3). The ENOENT was coming from xfs_iget. With that you mean the ip->i_d.di_mode checks? Given that we should only be bale to get these from NFS or the handle ioctls I suspect just turning them into ESTALE should be fine. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: failure mapping nfs fh to inode should return ESTALE, Alex Elder |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: vmscan: Do not writeback filesystem pages in direct reclaim, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: failure mapping nfs fh to inode should return ESTALE, Alex Elder |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: failure mapping nfs fh to inode should return ESTALE, J. Bruce Fields |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |