| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Updated xfsprogs 2.6.38 merge |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Jul 2011 01:27:44 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110711000135.GA23038@dastard> |
| References: | <20110705024855.GA561@dastard> <20110710210113.GA14527@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110711000135.GA23038@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:01:35AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > But even after that a simple mkfs crashed for me on 32-bit x86. Here is > > the gdb backtrace: > > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > 0x0805736b in tag_get (root=0xffffda5c, index=0) at radix-tree.c:82 > > 82 return 1 & (((const __uint32_t *)node->tags[tag])[offset >> 5] > > >> (offset & 31)); > > (gdb) bt > > #0 0x0805736b in tag_get (root=0xffffda5c, index=0) at radix-tree.c:82 > > #1 radix_tree_delete (root=0xffffda5c, index=0) at radix-tree.c:726 > > #2 0x08054ee7 in libxfs_umount (mp=0xffffd8f8) at init.c:822 > > #3 0x0805277c in main (argc=3, argv=0xffffdd94) at xfs_mkfs.c:2683 > > What size block device? It's not failing here... That was on a 40GB one, but I can also reproduce it on a 10GB one. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 04/11] xfs: factor out xfs_da_grow_inode_int, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfstests: fsx fallocate support is b0rked, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Updated xfsprogs 2.6.38 merge, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Updated xfsprogs 2.6.38 merge, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |