| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 27/27] xfs: avoid a few disk cache flushes |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:55:57 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110701094607.799498339@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20110701094321.936534538@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110701094607.799498339@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 05:43:48AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > There is no need for a pre-flush when doing writing the second part of a > split log buffer, and if we are using an external log there is no need > to do a full cache flush of the log device at all given that all writes > to it use the FUA flag. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 26/27] xfs: cleanup I/O-related buffer flags, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 27/27] xfs: avoid a few disk cache flushes, Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 27/27] xfs: avoid a few disk cache flushes, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 27/27] xfs: avoid a few disk cache flushes, Alex Elder |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |