| To: | Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Failure of xfstests test case 202 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:19:11 -0400 |
| Cc: | XFS Mailing List <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1307738387.7661.450.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1307738387.7661.450.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 01:39:47PM -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > Hi all, > > Test case 202 tries to create a single AG filesystem and runs xfs_repair > on it expecting it to fail. > > But, when I run the test with a filesystem that is bigger than 1TB it > fails (not pleasantly) since the max AG size is 1TB. > > I am thinking of the following solution, please let me know if there is > any other elegant fix. What about: # # The AG size is limited to 1TB (or even less with historic xfsprogs), # so chose a small enough filesystem to make sure we can actually create # a single AG filesystem. # _scratch_mkfs_sized `expr 1024 \* 1024 \* 1024` instead? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Failure of xfstests test case 202, Chandra Seetharaman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Failure of xfstests test case 202, Chandra Seetharaman |
| Previous by Thread: | Failure of xfstests test case 202, Chandra Seetharaman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Failure of xfstests test case 202, Chandra Seetharaman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |