| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs? |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Jun 2011 04:22:17 -0400 |
| Cc: | Norbert Veber <nveber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110609012907.GR32466@dastard> |
| References: | <20110607163742.GH28625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201106080911.11286@xxxxxx> <20110608122638.GQ28625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110609012907.GR32466@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:29:07AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > Then retry mounting the old fs with sunit= and swidth= parameters. Are > > > they on the same disks? What are your disks (number, kind)? > > > > Yes its already mounted this way as I mentioned in my original message: > > /dev/mapper/vg0-shared on /shared type xfs (rw,noatime,sunit=128,swidth=256) > > Those mount options are ignored if the filesystem doesn't have the > superblock feature bit set for aligned allocations. A filesystem > with 0/0 for sunit/swidth does not have the superblock bit set.... The other thing that sticks out is the lack of lazy-count for the old filesystem. That will give a lot of additional superblock updates on the old one. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Defragging XFS File Systems, Stan Hoeppner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Defragging XFS File Systems, Michael Monnerie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs?, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs?, Norbert Veber |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |