| To: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs? |
| From: | Norbert Veber <nveber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:26:38 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <201106080911.11286@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <20110607163742.GH28625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201106080911.11286@xxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 09:11:10AM +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Dienstag, 7. Juni 2011 Norbert Veber wrote: > > 20 seconds vs 3+ minutes?! The only difference I can see is > > lazy-count=1 and a larger agcount. Sunit and swidth were also set > > automatically by mkfs this time. > > Then retry mounting the old fs with sunit= and swidth= parameters. Are > they on the same disks? What are your disks (number, kind)? Yes its already mounted this way as I mentioned in my original message: /dev/mapper/vg0-shared on /shared type xfs (rw,noatime,sunit=128,swidth=256) Both filesystems are on the same MD raid 5 which consists of 3 1 tb WD Black hard drive. Thanks, Norbert |
| Previous by Date: | Re: I/O hang, possibly XFS, possibly general, Michael Monnerie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs?, Michael Monnerie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs?, Michael Monnerie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs?, Michael Monnerie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |