| To: | Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Failure of xfstest 229 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 May 2011 13:13:04 -0400 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS Mailing List <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1305909303.7661.373.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1305852937.7661.369.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110520025840.GP32466@dastard> <1305909303.7661.373.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:35:03AM -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > > Can it run successfully by fluke sometimes ? I did have a successful run > on the 20G filesystem yesterday once, but not able to reproduce it again It doesn't fail on thinly provisioned storage which zeroes out any blocks it gives to the OS. Similarly it might not fail if all blocks that it would normally leak are zeroed underneath for some reason, but it's rather unlikely that this happens by accident. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Failure of xfstest 229, Chandra Seetharaman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS mount via 2.6.38.5 fails - suggestions?, Paul Anderson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Failure of xfstest 229, Chandra Seetharaman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Failure of xfstest 229, Chandra Seetharaman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |