| To: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.39 delaylog default mount status |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Apr 2011 02:04:44 -0400 |
| Cc: | "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4DB117D7.4020307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4DB117D7.4020307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:53:27AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > If already asked and answered, my apologies. > > Is delaylog still on track to be the default in 2.6.39? Yes, it has been turned on by default since -rc1. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 2.6.39 delaylog default mount status, Stan Hoeppner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: drop "Mount point match" from 028 and 047 golden output, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | 2.6.39 delaylog default mount status, Stan Hoeppner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22, how could this IRIX bug get into Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid between kernels 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26?, Michael Lueck |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |