| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfs: clean up code layout in xfs_trans_ail.c |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:08:32 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110406181749.GC4356@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1302070758-17312-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1302070758-17312-7-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110406181749.GC4356@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 02:17:49PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > +/* > > + * Return a pointer to the first item in the AIL. > > + * If the AIL is empty, then return NULL. > > + */ > > > +/* > > + * Return a pointer to the item which follows > > + * the given item in the AIL. If the given item > > + * is the last item in the list, then return NULL. > > + */ > > These comment seem to line break strangely early. > > > + ASSERT((&next_lip->li_ail == &ailp->xa_ail) || > > + (XFS_LSN_CMP(next_lip->li_lsn, lsn) <= 0)); > > no need for the inner braces here. > > > + list_splice_init(list, &next_lip->li_ail); > > + return; > > and no need for the return. > > > I know it's all nitpicking about pre-existing code, but when you touch > it anyway it might make sense to tidy it up. Makes sense, I'll clean them up. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: convert the xfsaild threads to a workqueue, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 7/9] xfs: push the AIL from memory reclaim and periodic sync, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfs: clean up code layout in xfs_trans_ail.c, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 5/9] xfs: convert the xfsaild threads to a workqueue, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |