| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 7/9] xfs: push the AIL from memory reclaim and periodic sync |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:33:56 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1302070758-17312-8-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1302070758-17312-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1302070758-17312-8-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
The patch looks correct, but I wonder what the performance implications of flushing the AIL every 30 seconds are. Did you benchmark the patchset to see what it does to performance numbers for metadata intensive workloads? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfs: clean up code layout in xfs_trans_ail.c, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] xfs: remove unused 'bdi' variable in xfs_buf_readahead(), Jiri Kosina |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 7/9] xfs: push the AIL from memory reclaim and periodic sync, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 7/9] xfs: push the AIL from memory reclaim and periodic sync, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |