| To: | Adam Lackorzynski <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.38: Quota over NFS4 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:17:05 -0400 |
| Cc: | "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110323223017.GA5177@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20110320212633.GA26036@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110320213111.GO11929@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110320214316.GB26036@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110321184043.GC4992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110321222301.GB472@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110322221305.GA5857@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110323150328.GD23418@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110323174052.GE5005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110323190632.GA26306@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110323223017.GA5177@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:30:17PM +0100, Adam Lackorzynski wrote: > I probably mistyped something and thus bisected again: maybe this is just a symptom. When was the nfs4 code converted to just use a single open struct file, and what are the lifetime rules for it? It would easily be that a long alive file might make XFS keep persistent preallocations longer or similar issues. Adam, can you create a loop filesystem with ext3 or something else on it and see if the problem is XFS-specific? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH V2] xfstests 249: use -F option for xfs_io, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: preallocation transactions do not need to be synchronous, brian.foster |
| Previous by Thread: | Your mailbox has exceeded its limit, Gloster, Elizabeth |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.38: Quota over NFS4, J. Bruce Fields |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |