| To: | "Vincent,Wei" <weikun0905@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Some problem about the xfs_db?? |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:06:35 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <AANLkTimHb2J80CDYPKCXN3yB5=iQ=1ZvQd4iVBFRuiri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <AANLkTimHb2J80CDYPKCXN3yB5=iQ=1ZvQd4iVBFRuiri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 02:46:04PM +0800, Vincent,Wei wrote: > Hi all > I used the xfs_db to check the fragment about my disk. > First I had format the disk,then I try to write the file on it. > 5min later, we use df -h to check: > /dev/sda1 465.6G 295.4M 465.3G 0% /mnt/hdd0 > Now I use the : > xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/sda1 > actual 616, ideal 30, fragmentation factor 95.13% > > why?? this is nearly a new disk!!! How can it so many fragments? What kernel? What's the output of "xfs_info <mntpt>"? What command did you use to write the file? What's the extent map of the file look like (i.e. xfs_bmap output)? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Some problem about the xfs_db??, Vincent,Wei |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS status update for February 2011, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Some problem about the xfs_db??, Vincent,Wei |
| Next by Thread: | XFS status update for February 2011, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |